The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating [Psychological Science] [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology]. 2) Yes. The Dating Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Emerging Science of . males as the biologically less investing sex, often have little to lose by mating with as. Dating and Mating: The Social Psychology of Attraction and Romantic Relationships, by Madeleine A Fugère, Ph.D.
Turns out, women really do go for the James Bond-type men.
I've posted many studies offering hope and inspiration but to be honest and fair, we also need to look at facts about people many like to deny. And that's where the science of sex comes in. If you wish to retain illusions that the realm of sex and relationships is pure as the driven snow or that outside of physical dimensions there are no fundamental differences between men and women, turn back now as I am about to open a large can of peer-reviewed whoop-ass.
Naive romantics, I warn you one last time: When someone plays hot-cold, keeps you guessing, makes you constantly uncertain? Yeah, that makes you even more attracted: Participants in the uncertain condition were most attracted to the men — even more attracted than were participants who were told that the men liked them a lot.
Uncertain participants reported thinking about the men the most, and this increased their attraction toward the men. Had it up to here with narcissists? No, we haven't because they really are more attractive. You know what we like about them the most?
Human mating strategies
The worst parts — their entitlement and exploitativeness: The stereotypes are true: Most of us didn't need scientific studies for that but, hey, I'm thorough.
Studies show that often the main reason men kiss is to progress toward sex. The main reason men cuddle after sex is… to get more sex: The younger the woman, the more he spends: Sexual desire[ edit ] One theory states that because of their lower minimum parental investment, men can achieve greater reproductive success by mating with multiple women than women can achieve by mating with multiple men.
Ancestral women, by contrast, would have maximized reproductive success not by mating with as many men as possible, but by selectively mating with those men who were most able and willing to invest resources in their offspring. Gradually in a bid to compete to get resources from potential men, women have evolved to show extended sexuality.
Men are often depicted as wanting numerous female sexual partners to maximise reproductive success. Mate-guarding behaviours and sexual jealousy point to an evolutionary history in which sexual relations with multiple partners became a recurrent adaptive problem,  while the willingness of modern-day men to have sex with attractive strangers,  and the prevalence of extramarital affairs in similar frequencies cross-culturally, are evidence of an ancestral past in which polygamous mating strategies were adopted.
Every time a man has a new sexual partner, the woman also has a new sexual partner. It has been proposed, therefore, that casual sex and numerous sexual partners may also confer some benefit to females.
That is, they would produce more genetically diverse offspring as a result, which would increase their chances of successfully rearing children to adolescence, or independence. Youth is associated with reproductive value in women, and features that men find physically attractive in women are thought to signal health and fertility. Women who preferentially mated with men capable of investing resources in their offspring, thereby ensuring their offsprings' survival, would have left more descendants than women who did not.
Evolutionary psychologists have tested these predictions across cultures, confirming that men tend to report a greater preference for youth and physical attractiveness in a mate than do women, and that women tend to report a greater preference for ambition and social status in a mate than do men.
For example, as women gain more access to resources their mate preferences change. Finding a mate with resources becomes less of a priority and a mate with domestic skills is more important.
The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
Less clear, however, are the evolutionary benefits that women might have received from pursuing short-term mating strategies.
However, women in a stressed situation may benefit from protection from a male and short term mating is a way to achieve this as is seen in contemporary asylum seeker anthropological studies . One prominent hypothesis is that ancestral women selectively engaged in short-term mating with men capable of transmitting genetic benefits to their offspring such as health, disease resistance, or attractiveness see good genes theory and sexy son hypothesis.
Since women cannot inspect men's genes directly, they may have evolved to infer genetic quality from certain observable characteristics see indicator traits. One prominent candidate for a "good genes" indicator includes fluctuating asymmetry, or the degree to which men deviate from perfect bodily symmetry. Other candidates include masculine facial features,  behavioral dominance,  and low vocal pitch.
Human mating strategies - Wikipedia
Indeed, research indicates that self-perceived physical attractiveness,  fluctuating asymmetry,  and low vocal pitch  are positively related to short-term mating success in men but not in women. Mating strategy plasticity[ edit ] Research on the conditional nature of mating strategies has revealed that long-term and short-term mating preferences can be fairly plastic.
Following exposure to cues that would have been affected mating in the ancestral past, both men and women appear to adjust their mating preferences in ways that would have historically enhanced their fitness.
Such cues include the need to care for young, danger from animals and other humans, and resource availability. One way in which the more numerous sex might compete is by displaying the attributes that are most desired by the scarcer sex.