Drive on to prove creation with science - Technology & science - Science - Evolution | NBC News
St. Helens used in drive to prove biblical creation with science IMAGE: Lloyd Anderson at Mount St. Helens . flood happened as it is described in Genesis, from inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating to gaps in the fossil record. The Lava Dome at Mount St Helens Debunks Dating Methods It is made of dacite, a fine-grained volcanic rock that contains a sprinkling of. Although Swenson accompanied Austin on a trip to Mt. St. Helens, there is no indication from his Whole Rock and Mineral/Glass 'Fractions' from the Dacite.
Most rocks contain uranium, allowing uranium-lead and similar methods to date them. Other elements used for dating, such as rubidium, occur in some minerals but not others, restricting usefulness. Carbon decays almost completely withinyears of the organism dying, and many fossils and rock strata are hundreds of times older than that.
To date older fossils, other methods are used, such as potassium-argon or argon-argon dating. Other forms of dating based on reactive minerals like rubidium or potassium can date older finds including fossils, but have the limitation that it is easy for ions to move into rocks post-formation so that care must be taken to consider geology and other factors.
Radiometric dating and YEC[ edit ] See the main article on this topic: Young Earth creationism Radiometric dating — through processes similar to those outlined in the example problem above — frequently reveals that rocks, fossilsetc.
The oldest rock so far dated is a zircon crystal that formed 4. They tie themselves in logical knots trying to reconcile the results of radiometric dating with the unwavering belief that the Earth was created ex nihilo about 6, to 10, years ago. This is a real and common problem with radiometric dating techniques. Etna — erupted years ago, but rocks were dated 25 million years ago.
Lava flows at Mt. Ngaurhoe, New Zealand — erupted in, but rocks datedyrs old. Hualalai basalt, Hawaii erupted years ago, but rocks were dated 1. Etna basalt, Sicily, erupted inbut rocks were datedtoyrs old. Helens erupted inbut rocks were dated up to 2.
ALL of the samples taken from volcanic eruptions of known times and dates are carefully collected and sent to the labs. NEVER do they come back from the lab, with the note: Too young to measure. It is a definite pattern. Not very scientifically consistent is it? This has been known for many decades.
It is the prime reason many scientists have had doubts about radiometric dating all along. But recently, the RATE research team has conclusively demonstrated with independent lines of evidence that radioactive decay rates, widely used to bolster deep time, were dramatically accelerated in the past.
RATE found 3 indicators that strongly indicate decay rates changed in the past, all pointing to a young age for the rocks and the earth. This He is released into the crystal and rock. Helium atoms are pretty thin and can seep through solid rock. But even for He, this takes some time.How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 16 The Geological Column
The speed of Helium diffusion through solid rock has been measured. If long -age evolutionary guesses of the original amount of U are correct, then we can calculate how much Helium should have been produced and then seeped out of the crystal.
The Eruptive History of Mount St. Helens | Volcano World | Oregon State University
If the granite is billions of years old, only the most recent Helium would still be trying to work its way out of the rock. So there would be very little Helium left in the rock. BUT, if the rock is only thousands of years old not billionsthere should still be plenty of He still trapped in the solid granite rock.
What do we actually find? What does the data basis of true science show? There is enough Helium left in the rocks, to account for an age for Earth of only you guessed it! The standard age of the rock is said to be 1.
Plenty of time for the process to reach steady state by uniformitarian standards. All this time as Helium a very light element is given off, it slips around the other atoms and leaves the crystal lattice.
The hotter the crystal, the faster the He escapes into the surrounding rock. As the Zircon crystals were studied, it was apparent there was a lot of He still in the crystal — in fact much too much — if this was going on for a billion years. Measurements in a blind experiment were taken that showed how much Helium should be left after certain amounts of time, at various heat levels of the rock and the diffusion rate of He leaving the crystal.
Predictions were made for the diffusion rates based on two different relationships — one for an evolutionary time frame of billions of years, and one for a Creationist time frame of thousands of years. The results from an independent lab showed the diffusion rate to be practically the same as the predicted creationist rate. Extremely close — excellent results for the young-earth creationist time frame, and not at all what the evolutionary time frame predicted.
This is proof that those deep earth rocks with large amounts helium still in the zircon crystals were only thousands of years old. They cannot be a billion years old, or close to that figure. If you believe in predictive, quantifiable science, then you cannot believe in 1.
In order to get the level of helium found in the rocks, there had to have been a lot of radioactive decay. But the results show also that there was not only very a rapid decay episode, but the helium still in the crystal, shows it happened in the recent past.
Recent as in thousands of years ago, not millions let alone billions.
How Old Is the Mount St. Helens Lava Dome?
Samples came from several granites. Halos are a microscopic spherical pattern of damage in the crystalline structure of the granite. The damage is caused by high energy alpha particles that are emitted by radiometric decay of the Uranium in the rock. Particles like tiny bullets pierce the rock and leave a spherical pattern, outward from the U atoms.
Polonium is very unstable, and decays quickly. Let's begin with a basic understanding of the radiometric dating technique used, K-Ar, or potassium-argon. This dating technique depends on the fact that the radioactive isotope of potassium, 40K, naturally decays into other elements, as do all unstable radioactive elements.
There are two ways that this happens to 40K. About 89 percent of the time, a neutron inside the 40K undergoes beta decay, in which the neutron decays into a proton and an electron. This gain of a proton turns the potassium into calcium.
- The stirring on the mount
- Radiometric dating
But about 11 percent of the time, an extra proton inside the 40K captures one of its electrons and merges with it, turning the proton into a neutron and a neutrino, and converting the potassium into argon.
In both events, the atomic mass remains unchanged, but the number of protons changes, thus turning the element from one to another. This happens to 40K everywhere in the universe that it exists, and at the same rate, which is a half-life of 1.
This means that if you have atoms of 40K, 1. You'll also have 83 argon atoms, and calcium atoms. If I take a sample and measure an argon to potassium ratio of However, all of these numbers are probabilities, not absolutes.
You need to have a statistically meaningful amount of argon before your result would be considered significant. Below about 10, yearspotassium-argon results are not significant; there's not yet enough argon created.
In addition, the initial amount of 40K that you started with is never measured directly; instead, it is assumed to always be. This has a standard deviation, so it also contributes to the margin of error. So when my result says the sample was 2. The bell curve of probable age starts at about 1. So whether you call it an exact science or not is a matter of linguistics. Although the exact age can't be known, the probabilities can be exactly calculated.
Austin's sample was known to have solidified inits argon content was clearly well below the threshhold where an amount of argon sufficiently useful for dating could have been present. And even that threshhold applies to only the most sensitive detection equipment. Potassium-argon dating is done by destructively crushing and heating the sample and spectrally analyzing the resulting gases.
The equipment in use at the time at the lab employed by Dr. Austin, Geocron Laboratorieswas of a type sensitive enough to only detect higher concentrations of argon gas.
Geocron clearly stated that their equipment was only capable of accurate results when the sample contained a concentration of argon high enough to be consistent with 2, years or older. And so, by any standard, it was scientifically meaningless for Dr.